• J Henry Brems, Judith Vick, Deepshikha Ashana, and Mary Catherine Beach.
• Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: jbrems2@jh.edu.
• Chest. 2024 Nov 1; 166 (5): 115511611155-1161.

AbstractAgainst medical advice (AMA) discharges are practically and emotionally challenging for both patients and clinicians. Moreover, they are common after admissions for respiratory conditions such as COPD and asthma, and they are associated with poor outcomes. Despite the challenges presented by AMA discharges, clinicians rarely receive formal education and have limited guidance on how to approach these discharges. Often, the approach to AMA discharges prioritizes designating the discharge as "AMA," whereas effective coordination of discharge care receives less attention. Such an approach can lead to stigmatization of patients and low-quality care. Although evidence for best practices in AMA discharges remains lacking, we propose a set of strategies to improve care in AMA discharges by focusing on respect, in which clinicians treat patients as equals and honor differing values. We describe five strategies, including (1) preventing an AMA discharge; (2) conducting a patient-centered and truthful discussion of risk; (3) providing harm-reducing discharge care; (4) minimizing stigma and bias; and (5) educating trainees. Through a case of a patient discharging AMA after a COPD exacerbation, we highlight how these strategies can be applied to common issues in respiratory-related hospitalizations, such as prescribing inhalers and managing oxygen requirements. We argue that, by using these strategies, clinicians can deliver more respectful and higher quality care to an often-marginalized population of patients with respiratory disease.Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…