• Brianna M Lombardi, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Danya K Krueger, Sundania J W Wonnum, and Erica L Richman.
• Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
• Fam Med. 2024 Oct 1; 56 (9): 548554548-554.

Background And ObjectivesIntegrated behavioral health (IBH) delivered in primary care is critical to addressing the growing behavioral health crisis in the United States. COVID-19 prompted changes to the core components of IBH, causing the model to shift. The specifics of how IBH teams adapted and what these adaptations mean for the future of IBH teams in primary care are uncertain.MethodsWe conducted individual interviews with IBH team members using a semistructured interview guide. A purposive convenience sample consisted of primary care clinicians (N=20) from nine states. We used qualitative thematic analysis to code and generate themes.ResultsFour themes emerged: (a) permanent changes to the physical structure of the team; (b) increased reliance on technology for team communication; (c) shift in team collaboration, often occurring asynchronously; and (d) telehealth embraced for IBH.ConclusionsCOVID-19 interrupted the originally designed IBH model of team-based care. Changes to the physical proximity of team members disrupted all other components of IBH, requiring adapted workflows, communication via digital channels, virtual team building, asynchronous care coordination, and remote service delivery. Long-term evaluation of these innovations is needed to examine whether shifts in core components impact model efficacy. Training family medicine, primary care, and behavioral health clinicians for these adapted models of IBH will be needed.

39 keywords...

hide…