• J Fam Pract · Dec 1993

    Comparative Study

    Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races.

    • P Carey and D K Gjerdingen.
    • Department of Family Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota, St Paul.
    • J Fam Pract. 1993 Dec 1; 37 (6): 583587583-7.

    BackgroundCurrent information about racial differences in the rate of cervical abnormalities is incomplete, and there are few data about racial differences in compliance with follow-up and treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and follow-up of abnormal Pap smear findings in white, black, and Southeast Asian women.MethodsThe charts of women who attended a St Paul family practice residency clinic and who had abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear results between January 1, 1989, and September 1, 1992, were reviewed, and information about age, race, insurance, Pap smear findings, diagnostic studies, and treatment procedures was recorded.ResultsOf 1794 women who had Pap smears during this period, 190 (10.6%) had abnormal results, with a diagnosis of atypia, dysplasia, or carcinoma. The rate of abnormality was greater for black women (16.4%) than for Southeast Asian (6.1%) and white women (11.6%); however, the proportion of abnormal Pap smears that showed moderately severe or worse changes was greater for Southeast Asians than for whites (30.6% vs 14.3%, P < .05). Southeast Asian women with abnormal Pap smears were also less likely than whites and blacks to follow through with recommended diagnostic and treatment procedures.ConclusionsSoutheast Asian women in this study were less likely than white and black women to comply with recommended follow-up diagnostic and treatment procedures for cervical disease.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…