• World Neurosurg · Oct 2024

    Optimum Surgical Strategies for Medial Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Resection Extent, Visual Outcomes, and Vascular Injury.

    • Vipin Sahu, Ashutosh Kumar, Rushabh Mulchand Chheda, Vandan Raiyani, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Jayesh Sardhara, Ved Prakash Maurya, Pawan Kumar Verma, Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora, Kuntal Kanti Das, Anant Mehrotra, Awadhesh Jaiswal, and Sanjay Behari.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute, Lucknow, India.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 1; 190: e355e363e355-e363.

    Background/ObjectiveVisual impairment affects 55%-80% of medial sphenoid wing meningiomas (mSWMs) patients, making optic nerve decompression a critical surgical goal. Complete resection often leads to better visual outcomes. However, involvement of critical neurovascular structures increases postoperative morbidity and mortality, with vascular injury reported in 18%-20% of cases. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the extent of resection (EOR), visual outcomes, and the incidence of vascular injury, seeking to identify the optimal surgical approach for mSWMs.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients undergoing surgery for mSWM at our tertiary care center from January 2001 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria included histopathologically confirmed globoid mSWMs (N = 89). Patients with recurrent tumors (n = 14) or lost to follow-up (n = 9) were excluded. We classified patients into 2 groups based on EOR using Simpson's grade: Group 1 (good-resection,Simpson Grade-I/II,n = 51) and Group 2 (poor-resection,Simpson Grade III/IV, n = 15).ResultsAmong 66 (=N) patients, visual impairment was the most common symptom (81.8%), followed by headaches (77.3%) and seizures (27%). T2-hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging [(OR:5.4, 95%CI:1.5-18.6) (P-value<0.01)] and cavernous sinus-extension [(OR:3.9, 95%CI:1.1-13.1) (p-value-0.02)] were independent significant predictors of poor resection. Visual status was preserved in 90.3% of Group-1 and 86.6% of Group-2, with no significant difference based on EOR. Vascular involvement was noted in 87.9%, higher than the vessel encasement (>1800) (57.6%, P = 0.04). Vessel injury occurred in 7.8% of Group-1 and 6.6% of Group-2, with no significant impact on EOR.ConclusionsCavernous sinus-extension and T2-hyperintensity predict poor resection rates in mSWMs. While visual outcomes are not directly affected by EOR, long-term visual status may decline due to tumor recurrence and radiotherapy. Vascular injury incidence is not associated with EOR. Thus, the "maximal safe resection" of mSWMs involves a surgical strategy balancing targeted aggressive and conservative resection for maximal cytoreduction and functional preservation.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…