• J Eval Clin Pract · Dec 2024

    Staff and client preferences for the design and delivery of an outcomes monitoring system in a mental health service.

    • Philip J Batterham, Melonie Martin, Alison L Calear, Nicolas Cherbuin, Madeline Romaniuk, Michelle Banfield, Peter Butterworth, Michael Burvill, and Daniel Massang.
    • Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
    • J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Dec 1; 30 (8): 172817371728-1737.

    BackgroundOutcome monitoring can support the delivery of quality service that meets the needs of clients, clinicians and services. However, few studies have examined client or staff perspectives on the design and implementation of outcomes monitoring within a service. Implementation of outcomes monitoring requires understanding the preferences and expectations of relevant stakeholders.ObjectiveInformed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this study aimed to investigate the preferences and priorities of relevant staff, clients and family members to inform the design and implementation of an effective outcomes monitoring system in the context of a mental health service for military veterans and their families.MethodTwenty-nine staff participated across five online focus groups, including clinical staff, peer workers, policy staff and supervisors. Ten clients participated in online or telephone semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data.ResultsClients and staff agreed that outcomes monitoring should cover more than symptoms, particularly by incorporating functional outcomes. Assessing mental health over time was considered a valuable tool for supporting treatment processes and providing actionable information. Challenges identified by clients and staff included the need for efficient processes, ensuring measures are relevant and acceptable, and maintaining client privacy. The ability to personalise data collection and have a streamlined, responsive system were key attributes of a quality outcomes monitoring framework.ConclusionsFindings suggest that an effective outcome monitoring framework should be client-led, tailored to the individual's needs, and provide feedback on progress. Outcomes monitoring should also be efficient, accessible and allow for safe information sharing.© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.