• Crit Care Resusc · Jun 2024

    Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE).

    • Melissa J Parker, Gary Foster, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Karen Choong, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Lehana Thabane, and With the SQUEEZE Trial Steering Committee and on behalf of the SQUEEZE Trial Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group.
    • Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children's Hospital and McMaster University, 1280 Main St W. HSC 3E-20, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Ontario, Canada.
    • Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 1; 26 (2): 123134123-134.

    BackgroundThe SQUEEZE trial is a multicentred randomized controlled trial which seeks to determine the optimal approach to fluid resuscitation in paediatric septic shock. SQUEEZE also includes a nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, investigating the value of plasma cell-free DNA for prediction of clinical outcomes.ObjectiveTo present a pre-specified statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the SQUEEZE trial prior to finalizing the trial data set and prior to commencing data analysis.DesignSQUEEZE is a pragmatic, two-arm, open-label, prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.SettingCanadian paediatric tertiary care centres.ParticipantsPaediatric patients with suspected sepsis and persistent signs of shock in need of ongoing resuscitation. Sample size target: 400 participants.InterventionsThe trial is designed to compare a fluid-sparing resuscitation strategy to usual care.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome for the SQUEEZE trial is the time to shock reversal (in hours). The primary outcome analysis will assess the difference in time to shock reversal between the intervention and control groups, reported as point estimate with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical test for the primary analysis will be a two-sided t-test. Secondary outcome measures include clinical outcomes and adverse events including measures of organ dysfunction and mortality outcomes.ResultsThe SAP presented here is reflective of and where necessary clarifies in detail the analysis plan as presented in the trial protocol. The SAP includes a mock CONSORT diagram, figures and tables. Data collection methods are summarized, primary and secondary outcomes are defined, and outcome analyses are described.ConclusionsWe have developed a statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE Trial for transparency and to align with best practices. Analysis of SQUEEZE Trial data will adhere to the SAP to reduce the risk of bias.RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: Definitive trial NCT03080038; Registered Feb 28, 2017. Pilot Trial NCT01973907; Registered Oct 27, 2013.© 2024 The Authors.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…