• World Neurosurg · Oct 2024

    Review Meta Analysis

    Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Apex Aneurysms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Era of Flow Diversion.

    • Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Aryan Wadhwa, Emmanuel Mensah, Anvitha Sathya, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Jean Filo, Samuel D Pettersson, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Michael Young, Justin H Granstein, Philipp Taussky, and Christopher S Ogilvy.
    • Neurosurgicla Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 1; 190: 422433.e3422-433.e3.

    BackgroundEndovascular options for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms (BAAs) are heterogeneous, and evidence is limited to retrospective cohorts and case series. We seek to evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with various endovascular treatment methods of BAAs.MethodsSystematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating endovascular treatment of BAAs between January 2010 and July 2024 were included. Relevant information including occlusion rates, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment rates, and complications were subjected to meta-analysis.ResultsFifteen studies with 1049 BAAs were included. The median aneurysm diameter was 8.5 mm (range, 4.6-19.75), with a median follow-up of 33.7 months (range, 6.0-117.6). Residual aneurysm filling occurred in 24% after primary coiling (95% CI = 0.16-0.32), 25% after single stent-assisted coiling (s-SAC; 95% CI = 0.04-0.46), 25% after Y-stents (95% CI = 0.12-0.37), and 23% after flow diverter stent (FDS; 95% CI = 0.11-0.35). Recurrence rates were high for primary coiling (27%, 95% CI = 0.18-0.36) and s-SAC (19%, 95% CI = 0.13-0.26), but significantly lower for Y-stents (9%, 95% CI = 0.03-0.15) and FDS (4%, 95% CI = -0.04-0.11). Retreatment rates were 19% for primary coiling (95% CI = 0.12-0.26), 17% for s-SAC (95% CI = 0.07-0.27), 5% for Y-stents (95% CI = -0.03-0.12), and 13% for FDS (95% CI = -0.01-0.27). Meta-regression indicated larger aneurysms had higher complication rates (P = 0.02). Thromboembolic events were most frequent with FDS and Y-stents(12%).ConclusionsOcclusion rates were similar across treatments, but recurrence rates were significantly lower after Y-stents and FDS compared to primary coiling, although they carried a higher number of thromboembolic complications.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.