• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 2024

    American Association for Thoracic Surgery Quality Gateway: A Surgeon Case Study of Its Application in Adult Cardiac Surgery for Quality Assurance.

    • Lars G Svensson, Eugene H Blackstone, Linda DiPaola, Benjamin P Kramer, and Hemant Ishwaran.
    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024 Aug 5.

    ObjectiveTo demonstrate the application of American Association for Thoracic Surgery Quality Gateway (AQG) outcomes models to a Surgeon Case Study of quality assurance in adult cardiac surgery.MethodsThe case study includes 6989 cardiac and thoracic aorta operations performed in adults at Cleveland Clinic by a single surgeon between 2001 and 2023. AQG models were used to predict expected probabilities for operative mortality and major morbidity and to compare hospital outcomes, surgery type, risk profile, and individual risk factor levels using virtual (digital) twin causal inference. These models were based on postoperative procedural outcomes after 52,792 cardiac operations performed in 19 hospitals of 3 high-performing hospital systems with overall hospital mortality of 2.0%, analyzed by advanced machine learning for rare events.ResultsFor individual surgeons, their patients, hospitals, and hospital systems, the Surgeon Case Study demonstrated that AQG provides expected outcomes across the entire spectrum of cardiac surgery, from single-component primary operations to complex multicomponent reoperations. Actionable opportunities for quality improvement based on virtual twins are illustrated for patients, surgeons, hospitals, risk profile groups, operations, and risk factors vis-à-vis other hospitals.ConclusionsUsing minimal data collection and models developed using advanced machine learning, this case study shows that probabilities can be generated for operative mortality and major morbidity after virtually all adult cardiac operations. It demonstrates the utility of 21st century causal inference (virtual [digital] twin) tools for assessing quality for surgeons asking "how am I doing?," their patients asking "what are my chances?," and the profession asking "how can we get better?"Copyright © 2024 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…