• Andrew King, Julie-Ann Thompson, Stewart Hart, and Bobby Nossaman.
• From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Queensland School of Medicine-Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana.
• South. Med. J. 2024 Aug 1; 117 (8): 494497494-497.

ObjectivesParturients are at increased risk for difficult airway management with subsequent fetal complications. Videolaryngoscopy was opined to be the new standard of airway care to facilitate orotracheal intubation under urgent care conditions. We examined in parturients requiring general anesthesia for urgent cesarean delivery the association of the type of laryngoscopy technique and time required to facilitate orotracheal intubation with the incidence of subsequent neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.MethodsFollowing institutional review board approval, 431 parturients aged 18 years and older who underwent urgent cesarean section requiring general anesthesia were entered into this study. Patient characteristics, maternal comorbidities, and indications for urgent cesarean delivery were collected from the electronic medical records from January 2013 to November 2018. Orotracheal intubation times by type of laryngoscopy (video or direct) and NICU admission rates also were collected. A measure of effect size, risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated for the likelihood of NICU admission by difficult orotracheal intubation and by type of laryngoscopy used to secure the airway.ResultsVideolaryngoscopy as the primary type of laryngoscopy was used in 24.1% (95% CI 20.3%-28.3%) of general anesthetics. The incidence of difficult orotracheal intubation was 4.4% (95% CI 2.8%-6.7%), with a higher incidence observed with videolaryngoscopy (8.7%) than with direct laryngoscopy (3.1%) and a risk difference of 5.6% (95% CI 0.001%-11.3%). The incidence of NICU admission was 38.4% (95% CI 34.0%-43.1%). Times for successful orotracheal intubation were longer with videolaryngoscopy. Videolaryngoscopy had a higher association for NICU admission (47%) than for direct laryngoscopy (36%), with a risk difference of 11.4% (95% CI 0.01%-22.3%).ConclusionsVideolaryngoscopy did not decrease the incidence of difficult orotracheal intubation, and it did not decrease the time associated with orotracheal intubation. Videolaryngoscopy was associated with a higher association of NICU admission. These results suggest that videolaryngoscopy does not supplant direct laryngoscopy as the standard of care for orotracheal intubation under urgent care conditions of general anesthesia for cesarean section.

27 keywords...

hide…