• Dilip K Sengupta, S H Mehdian, Jeffrey R McConnell, Stephen M Eisenstein, and John K Webb.
• Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom. dksg@hotmail.com
• Spine. 2002 Sep 15;27(18):2072-9.

Study DesignThis retrospective study evaluates two groups of patients with scoliosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, treated with two different surgical stabilization methods.ObjectiveTo determine whether fixation to the sacropelvis is always necessary for adequate stabilization of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Summary Of Background DataPelvic fixation is generally recommended for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Recent studies describe a more selective approach toward lumbar or pelvic fixation. Pelvic fixation is reserved for larger curves and established pelvic tilt.MethodsFifty cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, operated in two different centers and followed up for a minimum of 3 years, were reviewed. In the first group (Oswestry), 31 patients had fixation to the pelvis, using standard Luque instrumentation and pelvic fixation. The Galveston technique was used in 9 cases and L-rod configuration in 22 cases. In the second group (Nottingham), 19 cases had fixation to L5 using pedicle screws in the lumbar spine and sublaminar wires in the thoracic spine. These cases were operated on early, usually shortly after becoming wheelchair dependent.ResultsIn the pelvic fixation group, the mean age at the time of surgery was 14 years, and forced vital capacity was 44%. The mean Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity were 48 degrees and 19.8 degrees at the time of surgery, 16.7 degrees and 7.2 degrees immediately after surgery, and 22 degrees and 11.6 degrees at the final follow-up (mean 4.6 years), respectively. The mean blood loss was 4.1 L, and the average hospital stay was 17 days. There were five major complications, including a deep wound infection in one case, revision of instrumentation prominence at the proximal end in two cases, and loosening of pelvic fixation in two cases. In the lumbar fixation group, the mean age at the time of surgery was 11.7 years, and forced vital capacity was 58%. The mean Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity were 19.8 degrees and 9 degrees at the time of surgery, 3.2 degrees and 2.2 degrees immediately after surgery, and 5.2 degrees and 2.9 degrees at the final follow-up (mean 3.5 years), respectively. The mean estimated blood loss (3.3 L) and mean hospital stay (7.7 days) were much less compared with the pelvic fixation group. Pelvic obliquity was corrected and maintained below 10 degrees in all but two cases, who had an initial pelvic obliquity exceeding 20 degrees. One patient had instrumentation failure at the proximal end, and one had a deep wound infection.ConclusionLumbar fixation to L5 is adequate if the surgery is performed early, soon after becoming wheelchair bound, and with smaller curves and minimal pelvic obliquity. Use of pedicle screws in lumbar spine provides a solid foundation to maintain the correction over the period of relatively short life expectancy of these children. Pelvic fixation may be necessary in older children, who have larger curves and established pelvic obliquity. In the presence of deteriorating lung function, this is associated with a greater morbidity and higher complication rate.

35 keywords...

hide…