• Tijmen W Kraai, Sylvester R Groen, Femke Nawijn, PannemanMartien J MMJMConsumer and Safety Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands., Mike Hogervorst, BrinkeJoost G TenJGTDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, Netherlands., and GoslingsJ CarelJCDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands..
• Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. t.w.kraai@gmail.com.
• Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep 1; 33 (9): 363736443637-3644.

PurposeTo study trends in incidence and outcome of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the Netherlands before, during and after implementation of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) and Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS®)- Spinal Motion Restriction(SMR) protocol.MethodsIn an observational database we studied national hospital admission and emergency department databases to analyse incidence rates and outcome of traumatic spinal cord injury and spinal fractures in the emergency department and in admittances in The Netherlands between 1986 and 2021.ResultsA significant increase of 39% in TSCI in admitted patients with spinal fractures over the past 35 years (p < 0.001). This increase was especially prevalent in cervical spinal fractures (132%), while thoracic and lumbosacral spinal fractures showed a decrease in accompanied TSCI (64% and 88% respectively). The overall increase in spinal fractures was not significant. The duration of hospital admission decreased for spinal fractures without TSCI and with TSCI (66% and 56% respectively).ConclusionSince implementation of the SMR-protocol was aiming to limit TSCI in patients who suffered a spinal fracture, the increase in TSCI is an unexpected finding. Exact explanation for this increase is unclear and the contribution of the SMR-protocol is not fully understood due to confounders in the used datasets. Either way, the scientific evidence supporting this costly time- and labor-intensive SMR-protocol remains debated, along with evidence contradicting it. Therefore it stresses the need for clear, evidencebased reasoning for spinal immobilization according to ATLS, as this is currently lacking.© 2024. The Author(s).

20 keywords...

hide…