• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Dec 2024

    Concordance and Prognostic Relevance of Different Definitions of Systemic Sclerosis Interstitial Lung Disease Progression.

    • Enrico De Lorenzis, Francesco Del Galdo, Gerlando Natalello, Francesco Varone, Stefano Di Donato, Lucrezia Verardi, Lucio Calandriello, Vishal Kakkar, Pier Giacomo Cerasuolo, LariciAnna RitaAR0000-0002-1882-6244Division of Thorax and Cardiovascular Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Silvia Laura Bosello, and Luca Richeldi.
    • Division of Rheumatology, Department of Geriatrics, Orthopedics and Rheumatology.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024 Dec 1; 210 (11): 134813571348-1357.

    AbstractRationale: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a common complication that has a varied progression rate and prognosis. Different progression definitions are available, including minimal clinically important worsening of FVC, EUSTAR (European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group) progression, OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials) progression, and Erice ILD working group progression. Pulmonary function and symptom changes may act as specific confounding factors when applying these definitions in SSc. Objectives: To assess the concordance and prognostic value of four different definitions in patients with SSc-ILD overall and in specific clinical groups. Methods: Progression status in consecutive patients with SSc-ILD was assessed over 24 months, and 60-month disease-related mortality risk was compared between progressors and nonprogressors using four definitions. Measurements and Main Results: Among 245 patients, 26 SSc-related deaths were reported. Mortality was linked to progression for minimal clinically important worsening of FVC (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-4.97), OMERACT (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.28-6.57), and Erice definitions (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.23-5.89). The association between progression and mortality was poor in patients with disease duration ≥3 years, mild functional impairment, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥40 mm Hg. Erice criteria appeared superior in patients with duration ≥3 years, limited cutaneous variant, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure <40 mm Hg. OMERACT criteria performed better in diffuse cutaneous variant patients with severe functional impairment. Conclusions: The four evaluated definitions of progression in SSc-ILD are not interchangeable, resulting in up to one-third of cases being classified differently on the basis of adopted criteria and presenting different prognostic values, particularly within specific clinical groups.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…