• Jennifer R Hemler, Benjamin F Crabtree, Denalee O'Malley, Jenna Howard, Lisa Mikesell, Rachel Kurtzman, Benjamin Bates, and Shawna V Hudson.
• From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (JRH, BFC, DOM, JH, RK, SVH); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ (BFC, DOM, BB, SVH); School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LM); NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD (RK); Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (LM, BB, SVH); Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (BB). hemlerje@rwjms.rutgers.edu.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 May 1; 37 (3): 399408399-408.

BackgroundDespite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged.MethodsWe conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process.ResultsInnovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits ("GENERALISTS+") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time ("oncoGENERALISTS"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors ("ONCOGENERALISTS"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults ("ONCOgeneralists").ConclusionsPrimary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.© Copyright 2024 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

24 keywords...

hide…