• Lyndsay Taylor, Ahmada Ali Ahmada, Msanif Said Ali, Said Mohammed Ali, Jan Hattendorf, Ibrahim Said Mohammed, and Jennifer Keiser.
• Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
• Lancet. 2024 Aug 17; 404 (10453): 683691683-691.

BackgroundHuman hookworm is a cause of enormous global morbidity. Current treatments have insufficient efficacy and their extensive and indiscriminate distribution could also result in drug resistance. Therefore, we tested the efficacy and safety of emodepside, a strong anthelmintic candidate that is currently undergoing clinical development for onchocerciasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections.MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, superiority, phase 2b, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing emodepside and albendazole. Participants in the emodepside group received six 5 mg tablets of emodepside (totalling 30 mg) and one placebo; participants in the albendazole group received one 400 mg tablet of albendazole and six placebos. Participants were recruited from four endemic villages and three secondary schools in Pemba Island, Tanzania. Participants aged 12-60 years were eligible for treatment if they were positive for hookworm infection, and they had 48 or more eggs per gram from four Kato-Katz thick smears and at least two slides had more than one hookworm egg present. Participants' treatment allocation was stratified by infection intensity and efficacy was measured by cure rate: participants who were hookworm positive and became hookworm negative after treatment. Adverse events were reported at 3 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 14-21 days post-treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05538767.FindingsFrom Sept 15 to Nov 8, 2022, and from Feb 15 to March 15, 2023, 1609 individuals were screened for hookworm. Of these, 293 individuals were treated: 147 with albendazole and 146 with emodepside. Emodepside demonstrated superiority, with an observed cure rate against hookworm of 96·6%, which was significantly higher compared with albendazole (cure rate 81·2%, odds ratio 0·14, 95% CI 0·04-0·35; p=0·0001). The most common adverse event in the emodepside treatment group was vision blur at 3 h after treatment (57 [39%] of 146). Other common adverse events were vision blur at 24 h after treatment (55 [38%]), and headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (55 [38%] for headache and 43 [30%] for dizziness). In the emodepside treatment group, 298 (93%) of the 319 adverse events were mild. The most commonly reported adverse events in the albendazole treatment group were headache and dizziness at 3 h after treatment (27 [18%] of 147 for headache and 14 [10%] for dizziness). No serious adverse events were reported.InterpretationThis phase 2b clinical trial confirms the high efficacy of emodepside against hookworm infections, solidifying emodepside as a promising anthelmintic candidate. However, although the observed safety events were generally mild in severity, considerations must be made to balance the strong efficacy outcomes with the increased frequency of adverse events compared with albendazole.FundingEuropean Research Council.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…