• Meris Esra Bozkurt, Tugba Erdogan, Cihan Kilic, Humeyra Ozalp, Gulcin Ozalp, Emine Asci, Zeynep Fetullahoglu, Caglar Ozer Aydın, Gulistan Bahat, and Mehmet Akif Karan.
• Mersin City Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics - Mersin, Turkey.
• Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Jan 1; 70 (8): e20240250e20240250.

ObjectiveThis study examines the relationship between two frailty screening tools and 90-day all-cause mortality in geriatric inpatients.MethodsThe study included patients aged ≥60 years who were admitted to the geriatrics unit of a university hospital between June 2021 and August 2022 and whose mortality status and duration of hospitalization data were obtained from the Health Ministry System. During hospitalization, the patients were screened using two different frailty scales: the Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale (sMFS) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Patients scoring ≥5 on the CFS and ≥3 on the sMFS were considered frail.ResultsA total of 84 participants with a mean age of 78.3±7.6 years were included in this study, of which 36.9% were male. Of the total, 60.7% and 89.3% were considered frail according to the CFS and sMFS, respectively, and the prevalence of all-cause mortality within 90 days was 19%. A univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier survival method revealed CFS scores to be statistically significantly related to 90-day all-cause mortality (p<0.001), while sMFS scores were not found to be statistically significant (p=0.849). Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was identified between CFS score and all-cause mortality in multivariate analysis with Cox regression analysis [(p<0.001), hazard ratio (HR): 3.078; (95% confidence interval: 1.746-5.425)].ConclusionAn evaluation of frailty in hospitalized older adults using two different scales revealed the CFS to be superior to the sMFS in predicting all-cause mortality within 90 days.

26 keywords...

hide…