• Rachel Davies, Matthew Booker, Jonathan Ives, and Alyson Huntley.
• Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
• Palliat Med. 2024 Sep 1; 38 (8): 806817806-817.

BackgroundThe final year of life is often associated with increasing health complexities and use of health services. This frequently includes admission to an acute hospital which may or may not convey overall benefit. This uncertainty makes decisions regarding admission complex for clinicians. There is evidence of much variation in approaches to admission.AimsTo explore how Primary Care clinicians approach hospitalisation decisions for people in the final year of life.DesignSystematic literature review and narrative synthesis.Data SourcesWe searched the following databases from inception to April 2023: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, MedLine, PsychInfo and Web of Science followed by reference and forward citation reviews of included records.ResultsA total of 18 studies were included: 14 qualitative, 3 quantitative and 1 mixed methods study. As most of the results were qualitative, we performed a thematic analysis with narrative synthesis. Six key themes were identified: navigating the views of other stakeholders; clinician attributes; clinician interpretation of events; the perceived adequacy of the current setting and the alternatives; system factors and continuity of care.ConclusionThis review shows that a breadth of factors influence hospitalisation decisions. The views of other stakeholders take great importance but it is not clear how these views are, or should be, should be balanced. Clinician factors, such as experience with palliative care and clinical judgement, are also important. Future research should focus on how different aspects of the decision are balanced and to consider if, and how, this could be improved to optimise patient-centred outcomes and use of health resources.

14 keywords...

hide…