• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 2024

    Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Between Marfan Syndrome and Non-Marfan Syndrome Patients.

    • Luchen Wang, Yanxiang Liu, Mingxin Xie, Bowen Zhang, Sangyu Zhou, Xuyang Chen, Haoyu Gu, Song Lou, Xiangyang Qian, Cuntao Yu, and Xiaogang Sun.
    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024 Aug 21.

    ObjectivesA consensus on the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without MFS.MethodsThis retrospective study encompassed 230 consecutive patients who underwent TAAA repair between 2012 and 2022, including a comparison of 69 MFS patients and 161 non-MFS patients. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality. The secondary endpoint was early composite adverse events, including early mortality, permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent renal failure, and reoperation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the impact of MFS on early composite adverse events, while univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the association between MFS and overall mortality.ResultsCompared with non-MFS patients, MFS patients were younger (31.9±8.5 vs 44.8±12.3 years; P<0.001), with less comorbid coronary artery disease (0 vs 8.1%; P=0.034), more frequently underwent Crawford extent III repair (56.5% vs 34.8%; P=0.002) and applied normothermic iliac perfusion (91.3% vs 81.4%; P=0.057). There was no significant difference in the rate of early composite adverse events between MFS and non-MFS groups (23.2% vs 14.3%; P=0.099), which was verified by multivariable logistic regression analyses with multiple models. Overall mortality was significantly lower in MFS group compared to non-MFS group (log-rank P=0.026), with 1-, 5- and 10-year cumulative mortality of 4.4% vs 8.7%, 8.1% vs 17.2% and 20.9% vs 36.4%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses across different models further confirmed MFS as a significant protective factor for overall mortality (Model1: HR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.73, P=0.007; Model2: HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.13-0.75, P=0.009; Model3: HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.15-0.95, P=0.039).ConclusionsDespite varying risk profiles, MFS patients undergoing open TAAA repair can achieve comparable or even superior outcomes to non-MFS patients under tailored surgical strategies, meticulous perioperative care, and close follow-up surveillance, especially in the long term.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…