• Anesthesiology · Dec 2024

    Cardiovascular Effects of Increasing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in A Model of Left Ventricular Cardiogenic Shock in Female Pigs.

    • Oskar Kjærgaard Hørsdal, Kasper Lykke Wethelund, Nigopan Gopalasingam, Mads Dam Lyhne, Mark Stoltenberg Ellegaard, Ole Kristian Møller-Helgestad, Hanne Berg Ravn, Henrik Wiggers, Steffen Christensen, and Kristoffer Berg-Hansen.
    • Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; and Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
    • Anesthesiology. 2024 Dec 1; 141 (6): 110511181105-1118.

    BackgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) presents a medical challenge with limited treatment options. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation has been linked with clinical benefits in patients with CS. This study investigated whether increasing PEEP levels could unload the left ventricle (LV) in CS in a large animal model of LV-CS.MethodsLeft ventricle cardiogenic shock was induced in 26 female pigs (60 kg) by microsphere injections into the left main coronary artery. In one study, protocol PEEP was increased (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O) and then reverted (15, 10, and 5 cm H2O) in 3-min intervals. In another protocol, PEEP increments with higher granularity were conducted through 3-min intervals (5, 8, 10, 13, and 15 cm H2O). Hemodynamic measurements were performed at all PEEP levels during a healthy state and in LV-CS with LV pressure-volume loops. The primary endpoint was pressure-volume area. Secondary endpoints included other mechanoenergetic parameters and estimates of LV preload and afterload.ResultsCardiac output (CO) decreased significantly in LV-CS from 4.5 ± 1.0 to 3.1 ± 0.9 l/min (P < 0.001). Increasing PEEP resulted in lower pressure-volume area, demonstrating a 36 ± 3% decrease in the healthy state (P < 0.001) and 18 ± 3% in LV-CS (P < 0.001) at PEEP 15 cm H2O. These effects were highly reversible when PEEP was returned to 5 cm H2O. Although mean arterial pressure declined with higher PEEP, CO remained preserved during LV-CS (P = 0.339). Increasing PEEP caused reductions in key measures of LV preload and afterload during LV-CS. The right ventricular stroke work index was decreased with increased PEEP. Despite a minor increase in heart rate at PEEP levels of 15 cm H2O (71 beats/min vs. 75 beats/min, P < 0.05), total mechanical power expenditure (pressure-volume area normalized to heart rate) decreased at higher PEEP.ConclusionsApplying higher PEEP levels reduced pressure-volume area, preserving CO while decreasing mean arterial pressure. Positive end-expiratory pressure could be a viable LV unloading strategy if titrated optimally during LV-CS.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., on behalf of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.