• Pediatric emergency care · Jun 2006

    Visit-level acuity and resource-based relative value unit utilization in a pediatric emergency department.

    • Jay Pershad, Michelle Whitley, and Martin Herman.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Services, University of Tennessee Health Science Center & Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center, Memphis, TN 38103, USA. pers2260@bellsouth.net
    • Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Jun 1;22(6):423-5.

    ObjectiveThere is currently limited data on the distribution of evaluation and management (E&M) codes and resource utilization in pediatric emergency departments. We sought to ascertain the following: (1) the distribution of visit-level acuity among patients who sought care in our pediatric emergency department (PED); (2) mean relative value units per physician hour (RVUs/h) as a measure of health care provider productivity; (3) the extent of correlation between the mean number of patients seen per hour and RVUs/h; and (4) the difference in RVU's generated using observation codes versus a higher level E&M code for diagnoses that require an extended level of service.Design/MethodsThe study was conducted at an urban tertiary level, university-affiliated PED in a freestanding children's hospital. After obtaining data from patient encounters during the period from January through December 2004, we calculated total RVUs by using 2004 national Medicare data that pertained to facility coding, adjusted for data from Tennessee. We also reviewed the frequency of 3 diagnoses that usually require extended care to determine disposition (status asthmaticus [International Classification of Disease-9 Diagnosis Code 493.91], volume depletion [276.5], and sickle cell disease with crisis [282.62]). Utilizing a high-level E&M code (99285) and high-level, same day observation code (99236), we compared RVUs generated for each of the earlier said diagnoses.ResultsDuring the study period, 61,444 patient encounters occurred. Of the patients seen, 4678 (7.6%) were admitted. The most common E&M code used was 99283 (53.7%). The mean RVU's/h for pediatric emergency medicine physicians and for pediatricians (and nurse practitioners) were 4.36 and 3.08, respectively. There was high correlation between RVU's/h and the number of patients seen per hour (r = 0.85). The cumulative frequency of the 3 diagnoses that required extended care was 2602. Total RVUs generated when the high-level E&M code 99285 and the high-level observation code 99236 were used was 10,408 and 15,143, respectively.ConclusionsOur descriptive study provides PED benchmarking data on E&M code distribution and RVU utilization. RVU's/h may serve as a reliable measure of productivity. Although the use of observational codes in the PED requires additional documentation, their use for select diagnoses may appropriately reflect the level of service and have a favorable impact on the total number of RVU's generated.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.