• Joyce L Benner, Kirsten D S Boerma-Argelo, Myrthe D Simon-Konijnenburg, HoozemansMarco J MMJMDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar (CORAL), Northwest Clinics, Wilhelminalaan 12, Alkmaar, 1815 JD, The Netherlands.Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Scie, and Bart J Burger.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Orthopaedic Research Alkmaar (CORAL), Northwest Clinics, Wilhelminalaan 12, Alkmaar, 1815 JD, The Netherlands. jl.benner@nwz.nl.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug 1; 144 (8): 365736683657-3668.

IntroductionHoffa's fat pad is considered a source of anterior knee pain and may limit prosthetic knee function. Resection of Hoffa's fat pad in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however, is controversial, and little is known about the functional outcomes including gait quality. This double-blind randomized controlled trial (i) compared functional recovery between TKAs where Hoffa was resected or preserved, and (ii) compared recovery of self-reported function with objective (gait-related) outcomes.Materials And MethodsEighty-five patients (age 66.4 ± 8.0 years, 47% women) scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to either fat pad resection or preservation. Subjective measures of functioning were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively and included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Objective measures of functioning were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively and included instrumented range-of-motion and gait analysis. Longitudinal analyses (generalized estimating equations) were used to compare recovery between groups, and chi-square tests compared attainment of minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). Finally, correlation analyses explored associations between subjective and objective recovery in function.ResultsResection patients showed poorer improvement in KOOS quality of life in the first 6 weeks (B=-10.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-18.91, -1.12], p = .027), but stronger improvement in knee extension after 3 months (B = 3.02, 95%CI [0.45, 5.60], p = .021) compared to preservation patients. Regarding MCID or PASS, no differences were noted between groups at 3 and 12 months (all p > .05). Subjective function substantially improved in the first 3 months, while objective outcomes improved only between 3 and 12 months. Moderate to strong correlations were identified between changes in knee flexion and gait with Kujala and KOOS in the resection but not in the preservation group.ConclusionsSimilar functional outcomes were achieved after TKA with or without resection of Hoffa's fat pad. Hence, removing the fat pad to promote surgical exposure will not affect functional outcomes including gait quality. Functional recovery of objective outcomes was not always consistent with subjective recovery, suggesting that both self-reported as well as objective, gait-related outcomes may provide meaningful information on functional recovery following TKA.Trial RegistrationThis clinical trial was prospectively registered under the Netherlands Trial Registry (# NL3638). This registry has recently been replaced by the Dutch Trial Registry where this study can be accessed via https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/20994 .© 2024. The Author(s).

27 keywords...

hide…