• Xinglin Liu, Chunling Fang, Wenhao Hu, Chang Su, Fan Xu, Huiquan Hu, and Chengzhi Li.
• State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 6; 103 (36): e39564e39564.

AbstractTo compare the clearance rate of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) after 2 different treatments (conization vs hysterectomy), and investigate the influencing factors. A retrospective cohort was established in HSIL patients with HR-HPV infection treated with conization or hysterectomy from July 2020 to May 2022. Age matching (1:1) was conducted between conization group and hysterectomy group. Chi-square test and t-test were employed to compare baseline and clinical characteristics between the 2 groups (conization vs hysterectomy). In addition, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the influencing factors for HR-HPV clearance at 6 months after surgery. The HR-HPV clearance rates at 6 months were 70.6% and 73.8% in conization group and hysterectomy group in the matched groups, respectively (P = .755). Similarly, at 12 months, the clearance rates were 78.6% and 76.5% in the matched groups, respectively (P = .844). Considering different age groups among all patients, the HR-HPV clearance rates were 81.8%, 72.9%, 73.5%, and 53.6% in the 20 to 30-year, 31 to 40-year, 41 to 50-year and 51 to 60-year groups at 6 months, respectively, and the clearance rates were 87.5%, 80.6%, 84.5% and 52.9% at 12 months, respectively. For HSIL, the postoperative HPV clearance rates were similar between the 2 groups (conization vs hysterectomy), conization is enough to resect the lesion and eliminate HPV. In addition, we should pay attention to the postoperative HR-HPV status in the older population of the 2 groups.Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

32 keywords...

hide…