• Peter B O'Sullivan, Angus Burnett, Alexander N Floyd, Kristen Gadsdon, Julia Logiudice, Daniel Miller, and Hilary Quirke.
• Curtin University of Technology, School of Physiotherapy, Shenton Park, Western Australia, Australia.
• Spine. 2003 May 15;28(10):1074-9.

Study DesignA cross-sectional observational design study was conducted to determine lumbar repositioning error in 15 subjects who had chronic low back pain with a clinical diagnosis of lumbar segmental instability and 15 asymptomatic participants.ObjectiveTo determine whether individuals with lumbar segmental instability have a decreased ability to reposition their lumbar spine into a neutral spinal position.Summary Of Background DataProprioception of the lumbar spine has been investigated in individuals who have low back pain with variable results. The testing procedure's lack of sensitivity and the nonhomogeneity of groups may be responsible for the conflicting findings.MethodsRepositioning accuracy of the lumbar spine was assessed using the 3Space Fastrak to determine error in 15 participants with lumbar segmental instability and 15 asymptomatic subjects. The participants were assisted into a neutral spinal sitting posture and then asked to reproduce this position independently over five trials separated by periods of relaxed full lumbar flexion.ResultsLumbosacral repositioning error was significantly greater in participants with lumbar segmental instability than in the asymptomatic group (t[28] = 2.48; P = 0.02. There also was a significant difference between the groups at each individual sensor.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that individuals with a clinical diagnosis of lumbar segmental instability demonstrate an inability to reposition the lumbar spine accurately into a neutral spinal posture while seated. This finding provides evidence of a deficiency in lumbar proprioceptive awareness among this population.

17 keywords...

hide…