• Xuan Sun, Yiming Deng, Yong Zhang, Ming Yang, Dapeng Sun, Thanh N Nguyen, Xu Tong, Guangge Peng, Aihua Liu, Yun Xu, Yunhu Wu, Xiaokun Geng, Yang Wang, Tianxiao Li, Shihui Xing, Wei Wu, Yunxiang Ji, Hua Yang, Shouchun Wang, Xiaoping Gao, Weimin Yang, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Dapeng Mo, Xiaochuan Huo, Ligang Song, Xiaoqing Li, Jingbo Zhang, Hongwei He, Ming Lv, Shiqing Mu, Wengui Yu, David S Liebeskind, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao, and BASIS Investigators.
• Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
• JAMA. 2024 Oct 1; 332 (13): 105910691059-1069.

ImportancePrevious randomized clinical trials did not demonstrate the superiority of endovascular stenting over aggressive medical management for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). However, balloon angioplasty has not been investigated in a randomized clinical trial.ObjectiveTo determine whether balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management is superior to aggressive medical management alone for patients with sICAS.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsA randomized, open-label, blinded end point clinical trial at 31 centers across China. Eligible patients aged 35 to 80 years with sICAS defined as recent transient ischemic attack (<90 days) or ischemic stroke (14-90 days) before enrollment attributed to a 70% to 99% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial artery receiving treatment with at least 1 antithrombotic drug and/or standard risk factor management were recruited between November 8, 2018, and April 2, 2022 (final follow-up: April 3, 2023).InterventionsSubmaximal balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (n = 249) or aggressive medical management alone (n = 252). Aggressive medical management included dual antiplatelet therapy for the first 90 days and risk factor control.Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcome was a composite of any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment or after balloon angioplasty of the qualifying lesion or any ischemic stroke in the qualifying artery territory or revascularization of the qualifying artery after 30 days through 12 months after enrollment.ResultsAmong 512 randomized patients, 501 were confirmed eligible (mean age, 58.0 years; 158 [31.5%] women) and completed the trial. The incidence of the primary outcome was lower in the balloon angioplasty group than the medical management group (4.4% vs 13.5%; hazard ratio, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.16-0.63]; P < .001). The respective rates of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days were 3.2% and 1.6%. Beyond 30 days through 1 year after enrollment, the rates of any ischemic stroke in the qualifying artery territory were 0.4% and 7.5%, respectively, and revascularization of the qualifying artery occurred in 1.2% and 8.3%, respectively. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the balloon angioplasty and medical management groups was 1.2% and 0.4%, respectively. In the balloon angioplasty group, procedural complications occurred in 17.4% of patients and arterial dissection occurred in 14.5% of patients.Conclusions And RelevanceIn patients with sICAS, balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management, compared with aggressive medical management alone, statistically significantly lowered the risk of a composite outcome of any stroke or death within 30 days or an ischemic stroke or revascularization of the qualifying artery after 30 days through 12 months. The findings suggest that balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management may be an effective treatment for sICAS, although the risk of stroke or death within 30 days of balloon angioplasty should be considered in clinical practice.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03703635.

53 keywords...

hide…