• Matthew C Baker, Theresa R F Dreyer, Erin Naomi Hahn, and Keith A Horvath.
• Association of American Medical Colleges, 655 K St NW, Ste 100, Washington, DC 20001. Email: mbaker@aamc.org.
• Am J Manag Care. 2024 Sep 1; 30 (Spec No. 10): SP738SP744SP738-SP744.

ObjectivesThe number of commercial beneficiaries cared for by accountable care organizations (ACOs) is growing, but the literature examining their trends is nascent.Study DesignWe examined commercial claims data from 2019 to 2021 to compare beneficiaries attributed to participants in Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs with and without a major teaching hospital.MethodsWe calculated mortality and spending by setting for each ACO type by year.ResultsCompared with per-beneficiary rates at nonteaching ACOs, major teaching ACOs have lower mortality rates by up to 2.2 percentage points depending on the patient age group, $283 lower inpatient spending, and lower emergency department utilization in inpatient (-0.008) and outpatient (-0.013) settings, as well as $146 higher overall outpatient spending. Upward trends in mortality and beneficiary risk scores across both ACO types show disruption to health outcomes during COVID-19.ConclusionsThese results provide evidence that ACOs with major teaching hospitals may be more likely to achieve the value-based goals of ACOs. Means to accomplish those goals may include avoiding higher-intensity care and supporting access to lower-cost alternatives where clinically appropriate, such as reducing inpatient and emergency department stays by delivering timely, high-quality outpatient care.

23 keywords...

hide…