-
- Joseph A Greer, Jennifer S Temel, Areej El-Jawahri, Simone Rinaldi, Mihir Kamdar, Elyse R Park, Nora K Horick, Kedie Pintro, Dustin J Rabideau, Lee Schwamm, Josephine Feliciano, Isaac Chua, Konstantinos Leventakos, Stacy M Fischer, Toby C Campbell, Michael W Rabow, Finly Zachariah, Laura C Hanson, Sara F Martin, Maria Silveira, Laura Shoemaker, Marie Bakitas, Jessica Bauman, Lori Spoozak, Carl Grey, Leslie Blackhall, Kimberly Curseen, Sean O'Mahony, Melanie M Smith, Ramona Rhodes, Amelia Cullinan, Vicki Jackson, and REACH PC Investigators.
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
- JAMA. 2024 Sep 11; 332 (14): 115311641153-64.
ImportanceNumerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Design, Setting, And ParticipantsRandomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers.InterventionParticipants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits.Main Outcomes And MeasuresEquivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48.ResultsBy 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions.Conclusions And RelevanceThe delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.