• Yingjie Xu, Pan Zhang, Miaomiao Hu, Wen Sun, Guoqiang Xu, and Chunyan Dai.
• Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
• Neurosurgery. 2024 Sep 9.

Background And ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) within 24 hours of estimated occlusion time (EOT) and to evaluate the effect of early and late time window in a cohort of patients with VBAO treated with EVT.MethodsRetrospective analysis was conducted on patients within 24 hours of the EOT in 65 stroke centers in China. Favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale ≤3 at 90 days. Patients were divided into the medical management (MM) group and the EVT group. Times were dichotomized into early (EOT ≤6 hours) and late (>6 hours) time windows. Multivariate logical regression models were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EVT and the effect of time windows on outcomes in EVT patients.ResultsAmong 4124 patients, 2473 and 1651 patients were included in the early and late windows, respectively. 1702 patients received MM and 2422 were treated with EVT. EVT was associated with a higher rate of a favorable outcome at 90 days both in early (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% CI 1.94-2.41) and late (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.65-2.17) time windows. No differences were found regarding favorable outcome (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.03) between VBAO patients treated with EVT within and beyond 6 hours.ConclusionPatients with acute VBAO who received EVT within 24 hours were associated with improved favorable outcome compared with patients who received MM. EVT beyond 6 hours is feasible and safe with no increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…