• Injury · Sep 2024

    Investigation of the effectiveness of prehospital amputation devices on cadavers.

    • Peter Gedei, Szilard Rendeki, Norbert Wiegand, Peter Maroti, Ferenc Jozsef Molnar, Balint Nagy, Dora Keresztes, Peter Kiss, Ivett Jonas, Krisztina Szekely, Mark Ughy, and Jozsef Farkas.
    • Hungarian Ambulance Services, 1055 Budapest, Markó utca 22, Budapest, Hungary.
    • Injury. 2024 Sep 1; 55 Suppl 3: 111548111548.

    AbstractAmputations take place in the operating rooms. At dangerous sites, circumstances may necessitate on-site amputation to save lives. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the execution of the amputation or the instruments to be chosen. Furthermore, there are no widely accepted criteria for the standardized characterization of amputation devices. The present study examined the effectiveness of commercially available cutting tools and instruments used by rescue services as possible on-site amputation tools. Five different tools (Holmatro type hydraulic cutter, with two cutting attachments, reciprocating saw, hacksaw, Gigli saw) were used to carry out amputations on designated locations on cadavers (brachial, antebrachial, femoral, and crural regions). During the experiment, the time required for amputation and the number of necessary cutting attempts to detach limbs were recorded. The proximal cut surfaces were analyzed with the help of post-amputation CT scan-based 3D models. An Amputation Index (AI) was determined for each device in each examined region based on the cut surface quality. An Amputation Score (AS) was calculated using the time required for cutting, the number of cutting attempts, and the AI. With the help of AS, the usability of the used devices was determined. According to our scoring system, the reciprocating saw proved the most effective tool. Based on our results, we recommend the consideration and further investigation of the reciprocating saw as a possible on-site amputation device, as well as the introduction of the Amputation Score as an objective and quantitative indicator in the future characterization of on-site amputation devices.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.