• Am J Prev Med · Jan 2025

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Effectiveness of a Just-In-Time Adaptive App to Increase Daily Steps: An RCT.

    • Anne L Vos, Gert-Jan de Bruijn, Michel C A Klein, Sophie C Boerman, Josine M Stuber, and Edith G Smit.
    • Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.l.vos@uva.nl.
    • Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jan 1; 68 (1): 154163154-163.

    IntroductionAddressing the public health problem of physical inactivity, this study evaluates SNapp, a just-in-time adaptive app intervention to promote walking through dynamically tailored coaching content. It assesses SNapp's impact on daily steps and how users' perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness moderated its effectiveness.MethodsSNapp was evaluated in an RCT from February 2021 to May 2022.This trial was preregistered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL7064). Analyses were conducted in November 2022. A total of 176 adults (76% female, mean age of 56 years) were randomized to a control group receiving a step counter app (n=89) or an intervention group receiving the app plus coaching content (n=87). SNapp's coaching content encompasses individually tailored feedback on step counts and advice to engage in more walking, taking preferences regarding behavior change techniques into account. Additionally, SNapp provides contextualized content calling attention to suitable walking locations in the user's environment. The primary outcome was daily step count as recorded by the step counter app. User perceptions regarding ease of use and usefulness were assessed via survey at 3-month follow-up.ResultsMixed models indicated that the intervention did not significantly impact step counts on average over time (B= -202.30, 95% CI= -889.7, 485.1), with the coefficient indicating that the intervention group walked fewer steps per day on average, though this difference was not statistically significant. Perceived ease of use did not moderate the intervention effect (Bgroup × perceived ease of use=38.60, 90% CI= -276.5, 353.7). Perceived usefulness significantly moderated the intervention effect (Bgroup × perceived usefulness=344.38, 90% CI=40.4, 648.3).ConclusionsSNapp increased steps only in users who deemed the app useful, underscoring the importance of user perceptions in app-based interventions.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…