• Peter Bergmark, Mitra Sadeghi, Mareia Talvitie, and Rebecka Hultgren.
• Emergency Department, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
• Scand J Trauma Resus. 2024 Sep 23; 32 (1): 9494.

Background And ObjectiveMisdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) contributes to delayed treatment and potentially higher mortality. The symptomatology in patients with rAAA is complex and challenging, 25-50% presumably fulfill the criteria of the standard triad of signs (STS). The objective was to determine the initial signs registered for patients with verified rAAAs, and to investigate if an expanded diagnostic triad could increase the diagnostic accuracy.MethodsA population-based study was conducted among all patients presenting with verified rAAAs in Stockholm County, Sweden, from January 2010 to October 2021. Patients were identified with ICD code 171.3 (rAAA). The STS was defined as (1) abdominal pain, (2) syncope and (3) the finding of a pulsatile abdominal mass, the prevalence of STS was investigated. An expanded triad included similar and related signs commonly registered for patients with rAAA, and was referred to as the modified abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture signs (MARS). The MARS-signs encompassed (1) the registered pain-associated symptoms or signs, (2) all hypovolemic associated signs, and (3) pulsatile abdominal mass and/or ultrasound finding, and the prevalence was similarly investigated. Finally, the STS and MARS were compared to evaluate the usefulness and performance of the MARS-score.ResultsA total of 216 patients were identified. The majority were men (77%) with a median age of 78 years. The dominating symptom was abdominal pain (84%), followed by dizziness (50%). Few patients presented with three STS (13%), two STS were found in 37% and one STS in almost half of the patients (41%). By contrast, when applying MARS 35% presented with the complete expanded triad, 47% with two and 17% with one. Comparison of accuracy favored MARS (13 vs. 35% with 3 signs, P < 0.001 for STS vs. MARS) (2 or 3 signs, 48 vs. 82% STS vs. MARS, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe expanded MARS-signs could aid in easier and faster identification of rAAA patients, thus facilitating the first step with accurate diagnosis into the lifesaving rAAA care chain. Supportive diagnostic mnemonics and tools are especially important when targeting fatal diagnoses such as rAAA. Further studies are needed to investigate the implementation of the MARS-signs in various clinical settings.© 2024. The Author(s).

29 keywords...

hide…