-
Palliative medicine · Sep 2024
The focus on life-prolonging anticancer treatment hampers shared decision-making in people with advanced cancer: A qualitative embedded multiple-case study.
- Daisy Jm Ermers, Maartje J van Geel, Yvonne Engels, Demi Kellenaers, Anouk Sj Schuurmans, Floortje K Ploos van Amstel, Carla Ml van Herpen, Yvonne Schoon, Henk J Schers, Kris Cp Vissers, Evelien Jm Kuip, and Marieke Perry.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Palliat Med. 2024 Sep 27: 26921632412811452692163241281145.
BackgroundImplementing shared decision-making in oncology practice is often limited, particularly integrating the patient's context into decision-making. To improve this, we conducted a quality improvement project, CONtext. CONtext attempts to accomplish this by: (1) Integrating the patient's context into shared decision-making during consultation with the medical oncologist; (2) Actively involving the GP and case manager (a specialized oncology nurse), who often have knowledge about the patient's context, and; (3) Giving the person with advanced cancer a time-out period of up to 2 weeks to consider and discuss treatment options with others, including close family and friends.AimTo explore how persons with advanced cancer and their involved professionals experienced shared decision-making after the introduction of CONtext.DesignA qualitative embedded multiple-case study using in-depth interviews analysed with inductive content analysis.ParticipantsA purposive sample of 14 cases, each case consisting of a patient with advanced cancer and ideally their medical oncologist, case manager, and GP.ResultsFour themes were identified: shared decision-making is a dynamic and continuous process (1), in which the medical oncologist's treatment recommendation is central (2), fuelled by the patients' experience of not having a choice (3), and integrating the patient's context into shared decision-making was considered important but hampered (4), for example, by the association with the terminal phase.ConclusionsThe prevailing tendency among medical oncologists and persons with advanced cancer to prioritize life-prolonging anticancer treatments restricts the potential for shared decision-making. This undermines integrating individual context into decision-making, a critical aspect of the palliative care continuum.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.