• Irakliy Abramov, Andrea M Mathis, Yuan Xu, Thomas J On, Evgenii Belykh, Giancarlo Mignucci-Jimenez, Joelle N Hartke, Francesco Restelli, Bianca Pollo, Francesco Acerbi, Philippe Schucht, Randall W Porter, Kris A Smith, Jennifer M Eschbacher, and Mark C Preul.
• 1Department of Neurosurgery, The Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Sep 27: 1141-14.

ObjectiveBecause gliomas have poorly defined tumor margins, the ability to achieve maximal resection is limited. To better discern these margins, fluorescence-guided surgery has been used to aid maximal safe resection. The authors describe their experience with the simultaneous use of intraoperative fluorescein sodium (FNa) confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and operating microscope 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence imaging for glioma resection to improve CLE use for better margin discrimination.MethodsFNa CLE and 5-ALA wide-field imaging were used in 33 patients with gliomas. CLE imaging was enhanced with the use of a telesurgical pathology software platform that enables real-time conversation between the operating neurosurgeons and the pathologists located remotely. CLE was used for imaging tumor regions that were subjectively regarded as tumor margins under normal visualization with the operative microscope. After FNa CLE imaging, 5-ALA wide-field imaging was performed in the same regions. Tissue was biopsied at imaging locations, and interpretations of FNa CLE and 5-ALA wide-field imaging were compared to those of permanent histological sections.ResultsEighty-eight deep- and superficial-margin regions of interest (ROIs) were imaged with FNa CLE and 5-ALA imaging. Most of the ROIs interpreted by the neuropathologist as infiltrative glioma based on FNa CLE imaging lacked 5-ALA-induced fluorescence. Permanent histological sections from the corresponding regions were concordant with the interpretation of FNa CLE images in 57 of 88 (65%) ROIs and with the interpretation of 5-ALA imaging in 43 of 88 (49%) ROIs. The sensitivity and specificity of FNa CLE for the interpretation of tumor margins were 73% and 41%, respectively, and those of 5-ALA were 38% and 82%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values for CLE were 79% and 33%, respectively, and those for 5-ALA were 86% and 31%, respectively.ConclusionsConventional intraoperative evaluation of tumor margins, based on MRI and wide-field fluorescence imaging, can underestimate the invasiveness of gliomas. FNa CLE showed higher accuracy in detecting regions with infiltrating tumors than intraoperative 5-ALA imaging. Future considerations should include more rigorous comparisons of FNa CLE imaging and 5-ALA-guided resections on a larger cohort of patients.

7 keywords...

hide…