• Fabio Torregrossa, Alessandro De Bonis, Mariagrazia Nizzola, Miguel Saez-Alegre, Megan M J Bauman, Luciano Leonel, Stephen Graepel, Giuseppe Esposito, Giovanni Grasso, Giuseppe Lanzino, and Maria Peris Celda.
• 1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 4: 1111-11.

ObjectiveAdvances in surgical technology and microneurosurgery have led to increased utilization of so-called minimally invasive approaches, including the supraorbital eyebrow (SE) and minipterional (MPT) approaches for lesions involving the interpeduncular region. This study aimed to describe and compare anatomical landmarks, along with highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the SE and MPT approaches to the interpeduncular region.MethodsTen formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric specimens were used to perform bilateral SE and MPT approaches to the interpeduncular region. The operative depth of each approach to key anatomical landmarks was measured. Forty-five axial thin-slice computed tomography studies were reviewed to calculate the operative angles, with consideration of the midline as a reference. A 3D interactive anatomical model generated through the photogrammetry scanning technique was described.ResultsThe depths of the operative corridors of the SE and MPT approaches to the interpeduncular fossa were 83.4 ± 1.8 mm and 67.7 ± 3.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean angle of the MPT approach to the interpeduncular fossa was significantly wider than the one provided by the SE approach (39.9° ± 5.1° vs 28.4° ± 3.6°, p < 0.001). The interpeduncular region can consistently be accessed through the carotid-oculomotor triangle with the SE approach, as well as with the MPT approach. Furthermore, the SE route offered adequate access to the interpeduncular fossa through the opticocarotid triangle. The MPT route provided direct access to the upper prepontine cistern and anterior mesencephalic zone (AMZ).ConclusionsThe MPT approach provides a wider and shorter operative corridor and can be employed for lesions in the interpeduncular region with extension to the prepontine cistern and ventrolateral midbrain lesions requiring access through the AMZ. The SE approach is better suited for ventromedial midbrain lesions requiring access via the interpeduncular fossa safe entry zone. Additional studies analyzing these approaches in a clinical setting will help to delineate their reliability and efficacy.

7 keywords...

hide…