• Burns · Jun 2024

    Esketamine use for primary intelligent analgesia in adults with severe burns: A double-blind randomized trial with effects on analgesic efficacy, gastrointestinal function and mental state.

    • Qiulan He, Qi Liu, Bing Liang, Xu Zhao, Wenqi Huang, Shaowei Gao, Caiyun Chen, Fei Zhou, and Zhongxing Wang.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: heqiulan@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
    • Burns. 2024 Jun 22.

    BackgroundOpioid consumption for analgesia in burn patients is enormous. Non-opioid analgesics for burn pain management may result in opioid sparing, reducing opioid-related adverse reactions and drug tolerance or addiction.MethodsA dual-center, randomized controlled trial assessed Esketamine for the perioperative period in patients with severe [20-50 % total body surface area (TBSA)] and extensive (≥ 50 % TBSA) burns, comparing analgesia with standard anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two arms. In the Treatment Arm, patients received intra-operative Esketamine and postoperative intravenous primary intelligent analgesia pump with Esketamine. Patients in the Control Arm received the same intervention as Treatment Arm without Esketamine. The primary endpoint was subjective analgesic efficacy (SAE) evaluated on Day 28 or the day before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the postoperative Numeric Pain Rating (NPR) Scale at rest (NPRr) and during movement (NPRm) and opioid consumption. Gastrointestinal dysfunction Scores (GIDS) and serum markers of intestinal injury [intestinal fatty acid-binding protein 2 (iFabp2) and apolipoproteinA2 (ApoA2)] were measured in the 1st and 4th post-injury weeks. Depression and sleep quality were assessed by relevant questionnaires.ResultsFifty-five patients were included in the analysis. Esketamine-treated Arm recorded a better analgesic efficacy than the Control Arm (proportion of patients with Grade 1 or 2 SAE scores, 67.9 % vs. 40.7 %, p = 0.022). Esketamine-treated patients had lower NPRm values (p = 0.033) and lower daily opioid consumption (p = 0.033) when compared with Controls. Esketamine-treated patients showed comparable gastrointestinal recovery to those in the Control Arm. The overall sleep quality might be improved in the Treatment Arm.ConclusionsEsketamine use is safe for perioperative primary intelligent analgesia of severe burns, resulting in improved resting pain control and lower opioid requirements.Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn/) (ChiCTR2000034069).Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.