• World Neurosurg · Oct 2024

    Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study.

    • Yukun Ma, Xing Yu, Luchun Xu, Yang Xiong, Guozheng Jiang, Jiawei Song, and Yongdong Yang.
    • Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 15.

    ObjectiveTo observe the short-term to medium-term therapeutic effects and radiological outcomes of adjacent 2-level cervical spondylosis treated with artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) using Mobi-C and Bryan discs. To observe changes and discrepancies in the flexion-extension centers of rotation (FE-COR) of different ACDR segments.MethodsTwenty-four patients undergoing 2-level (C4/5 and C5/6) ACDR were analyzed retrospectively (11 patients in the Mobi-C group and 13 patients in the Bryan group). Clinical outcomes were assessed using modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale. Preoperative and 2 years' follow-up radiographs were collected to compare total cervical spine curvature (C2-C7) range of motion (ROM), upper and lower ACDR segmental ROM, and the operated adjacent segmental ROM. The FE-COR of the ACDR segment was measured using the mid-plumb line method. The degree of disc degeneration in the adjacent segment was observed.ResultsAt the 2 years' follow-up, in both group, the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score increased significantly, and the Neck Disability Index and neck and upper extremity visual analog scale scores decreased significantly compared with preoperative (P < 0.05). There were no significant statistical differences in postoperative scores between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The overall cervical ROM, the upper and lower segmental ROM at the 2 years' follow-up showed no significant statistical differences compared with the preoperative period (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the adjacent segmental ROMs compared with the preoperative period (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the measurements of the ROM at each time points between the Mobi-C Group and the Bryan Group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the preoperative FE-COR-X (indicating the horizontal position of the point in the coordinate system) and FE-COR-Y (indicating the vertical position of the point in the coordinate system) of upper or lower ACDR segments between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). At the 2 years' follow-up, there were significant differences both in FE-COR-X and FE-COR-Y between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). For the Mobi-C group, in both the upper and lower segment, the FE-COR-X significantly increased compared with preoperative (P < 0.05), while the FE-COR-Y decreased compared with preoperative (P < 0.05). For the Bryan group, no significant changes were observed in the upper or lower segment in both FE-COR-X and FE-COR-Y compared with preoperative (P > 0.05). Fourty-eight adjacent segments (24 superior and 24 inferior segments) were included in the studies of adjacent segment disease. Four segments showed imaging adjacent segment disease (4/48, 8.33%) in 4 patients, of which 2 were mild and 2 were moderate according to the grading criteria. Among them, 2 were from the Mobi-C group and 2 were from the Bryan group. No severe imaging degeneration was observed.ConclusionsIn continuous 2-level cervical ACDR surgery, both Mobi-C and Bryan artificial cervical discs achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in the short to medium term postoperatively. The FE-COR exhibited different trends of change. In the Mobi-C group, the FE-COR for both upper and lower segments shifted anteriorly and inferiorly, whereas in the Bryan group, whether upper or lower, the FE-COR remained closer to the preoperative state. The changes in FE-COR did not significantly affect the short-term to medium-term clinical outcomes postoperatively.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…