• Raghuram Koganti, Moshe M Cohn, Steven H Resnicoff, and Steven Roth.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
• Anesthesiology. 2024 Nov 1; 141 (5): 849858849-858.

AbstractConscientious objection is a legally protected right of medical professionals to recuse themselves from patient care activities that conflict with their personal values. Anesthesiology is different from most specialties with respect to conscientious objection in that the focus is to facilitate safe, efficient, and successful performance of procedures by others, rather than to perform the treatment in question. This could give rise to a unique, somewhat indirect ethical tension between the application of conscientious objection and potential infringement upon patient autonomy and well-being. While some situations have clear grounds and precedent for conscientious objection (e.g., abortion, or futile procedures), newer procedures, such as gender-affirming surgery and xenotransplantation, may trigger conscientious objection for complex reasons. This review discusses ethical, legal, and practical aspects of conscientious objection; challenges to anesthesia groups, departments, and healthcare organizations when conscientious objection is invoked by anesthesiologists; and strategies to help mitigate the ethical dilemmas.Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.

8 keywords...

hide…