• Antonio Russo, Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Alessandro Massè, and Giorgio Burastero.
• Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 24, 10126, Turin, Italy.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct 4.

IntroductionThe total number of total knee arthroplasty performed is rising, and the number of revisions is rising accordingly. Periprosthetic joint infection emerged in recent years as a leading cause of total knee revisions. Bone loss is a real challenge when facing septic knee revisions since radical debridement is crucial to overcome infection. Many devices have already demonstrated to reliably address bone loss and guarantee enhanced fixation. However, the role of balancing metaphyseal fixation and its interplay with the level of constraint has not been elucidated yet.Material And MethodsAn institutional arthroplasty registry was retrospectively reviewed looking for patients who underwent two-stage revision of the knee and metaphyseal cones implantation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of cones only on one side (femoral or tibial, Group U) or both femoral and tibial side (Group B). Failure, aseptic loosening, and revision rates were compared between groups, as were values of patient-reported outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival of implants.ResultsA total of 65 patients were included in the analysis and were evaluated at a mean final follow-up of 4 years (range, 2-7). Mean age was 67 (range, 43-81) years. Mean BMI was 27.4 (range, 20-37) kg/m2. The overall mean KSS, OKS, ROM significantly increased from baseline values to last follow-up (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients included in Group U had a significantly lower rate of implant survival compared to those included in Group B.ConclusionsPatients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection present considerable rates of complication and failure. Management of bone loss represents a concern for the surgeon, who must achieve a stable fixation. Our study demonstrated that implants characterized by an unbalanced metaphyseal fixation are at higher risk of aseptic loosening and consequent revision, especially when coupled with hinged inserts.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

5 keywords...

hide…