• Sun-Kyung Park, Dong Woo Han, Chul Ho Chang, Hyunjoo Jung, Hyun Kang, and Young Song.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
• Anesthesiology. 2025 Jan 1; 142 (1): 107120107-120.

BackgroundElectroencephalogram burst suppression can be associated with postoperative delirium; however, the results of relevant studies are discrepant. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between intraoperative burst suppression and postoperative delirium in adult surgical patients.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched and updated in May 2023. The authors included cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled studies reporting on postoperative delirium incidence with documented intraoperative burst suppression in adults receiving general anesthesia for any surgery. The primary outcome was the pooled odds ratio for postoperative delirium in cases with intraoperative burst suppression compared to those without burst suppression, calculated using a random-effects model. Two independent investigators extracted the data. The protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration No. CRD42022326479); the results were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsFourteen studies (6,435 patients) were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of postoperative delirium was 21.1% (1,358 of 6,435). Patients with intraoperative burst suppression had a higher incidence of postoperative delirium than those without burst suppression (pooled odds ratio, 1.492; 95% CI, 1.022 to 2.178; I2 = 44%; 95% CI, 0 to 75%; τ2 = 0.110). The intraoperative duration of burst suppression was significantly longer in patients who developed postoperative delirium (standardized mean difference, 0.462; 95% CI, 0.293 to 0.632; I2 = 63%; 95% CI, 16 to 84%; τ2 = 0.027). The burst suppression ratio was significantly higher in the delirium group (standardized mean difference, 0.150; 95% CI, 0.055 to 0.245; I2 = 0%; 95% CI, 0 to 85%; τ2 = 0.00).ConclusionsThe meta-analysis suggests an association between intraoperative burst suppression and postoperative delirium; however, the quality of evidence was very low. The limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity across them emphasize the need for further high-quality studies to establish a more robust conclusion.Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…