• Pain physician · Sep 2024

    Multicenter Study Observational Study

    A Novel Sequential Percutaneous Radiofrequency Treatment Strategy for Drug-refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Propensity Score-matched Study.

    • Hao Ren, Yang Wang, Zheng Chen, Yan Zhang, Guo Feng Ma, and Fang Luo.
    • Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
    • Pain Physician. 2024 Sep 1; 27 (7): E785E794E785-E794.

    BackgroundGasserian ganglion-targeted conventional and pulsed radiofrequency treatments are percutaneous procedures performed for drug-refractory trigeminal neuralgia. However, ideal outcomes are not always achieved with these procedures; frequent postprocedural complications and therapeutic ineffectiveness are also of major concern.ObjectivesThis study was conducted to investigate a novel strategy for effective, uncomplicated pain relief in patients with drug-refractory trigeminal neuralgia.Study DesignA multicenter, retrospective, observational study.SettingParticipating centers were Beijing Tiantan Hospital and Sanbo Brain Hospital.MethodsFrom January 2010 through December 2019, a total of 2,087 patients with drug-refractory trigeminal neuralgia were included in the current study. Of them, 143 underwent sequential conventional radiofrequency treatment and 1,944 underwent conventional radiofrequency treatment only. The primary outcome was being pain free at 24 months postprocedure; multiple secondary outcomes were compared between treatments before and after propensity score matching.ResultsAt the 24-month follow-up, sequential radiofrequency treatment provided a higher pain-free outcome than conventional radiofrequency treatment (0.93 [95% CI, 0.92-0.94]) vs 0.89, (95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P = 0.04); hazard ratio, 1.703 (95% CI, 1.01-2.86). For the 124 propensity score-matched pairs, there was no significant difference between groups, although pain-free outcomes were numerically higher in the sequential radiofrequency treatment group (0.93 [95% CI, 0.89-0.98]) vs 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96; P = 0.3); hazard ratio, 0.653 (95% CI, 0.27-1.60). Notably, sequential radiofrequency treatment correlated with fewer overall postprocedural complications than conventional radiofrequency treatment, despite propensity score matching analysis (14/143 vs 723/1944, relative risk, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74; P < 0.001); 11/124 vs 45/124, relative risk 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.80; P < 0.001).LimitationsProcedural parameters and quality of life evaluation by treatment were not analyzed and cost data were not collected.ConclusionSequential radiofrequency treatment has the potential to provide effective, uncomplicated, pain-free outcomes.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…