• Hillary D Lum, Jessica Cassidy, Chen-Tan Lin, Catherine M DesRoches, Prajakta Shanbhag, Kelly T Gleason, Danielle S Powell, Danielle Peereboom, Catherine A Riffin, Jamie M Smith, Aleksandra Wec, and Jennifer L Wolff.
• Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, 12631 E. 17Th Ave B-179, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. hillary.lum@ucdenver.edu.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1.

BackgroundPatients, families, and clinicians increasingly communicate through patient portals. Due to potential for multiple authors, clinicians need to know who is communicating with them. OurNotes is a portal-based pre-visit agenda setting questionnaire. This study adapted OurNotes to include a self-identification question to help clinicians interpret information authored by nonpatients.ObjectivesTo describe adapted OurNotes use and clinician feedback to inform broader implementation.DesignEvaluation of adapted OurNotes in a geriatric practice.ParticipantsOlder adults with a portal account and a clinic visit; eight clinicians were interviewed.InterventionOurNotes adaptation to clarify whether the author is the patient, the patient with help, or a nonpatient.ApproachCross-sectional chart review of OurNotes completion, patient characteristics, and visit topics by author type. Clinician interviews explored experiences with OurNotes.ResultsOut of 503 visits, 134 (26%) OurNotes questionnaires were completed. Most respondents (n = 92; 69%) identified as the patient, 18 (14%) identified as the patient with help, and 24 (17%) identified as someone other than the patient. On average, patients who authored their own OurNotes were younger (80.9 years) compared to patients who received assistance (85.8 years), or patients for whom someone else authored OurNotes (87.8 years) (p < 0.001). A diagnosis of cognitive impairment was present among 20% of patients who self-authored OurNotes vs. 79% of patients where someone else authored OurNotes (p < 0.001). Topics differed when OurNotes was authored by patients vs. nonpatients. Symptoms (52% patient vs. 83% nonpatient, p = 0.004), community resources (6% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), dementia (5% vs. 21%, p = 0.009), and care partner concerns (1% vs. 12%, p = 0.002) were more often mentioned by nonpatients. Clinicians valued the self-identification question for increasing transparency about who provided information.ConclusionsA self-identification question can identify nonpatient authors of OurNotes. Future steps include evaluating whether transparency improves care quality, especially when care partners are involved.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

5 keywords...

hide…