• Sao Paulo Med J · Mar 2003

    How reproducible is self-reported information on exposure to smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns? Evidence among Brazilian adults in the Pró-Saúde Study.

    • Dóra Chor, Eduardo Faerstein, Márcia Guimarães Mello Alves, and de Souza LopesClaudiaC.
    • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. dorinha@ensp.fiocruz.br
    • Sao Paulo Med J. 2003 Mar 5; 121 (2): 636663-6.

    ContextEpidemiological studies of the validity and reliability of self-reported information on important risk factors for non-communicable chronic diseases are scarce in Brazil.ObjectiveWe evaluated the test-retest reliability of information--overall and stratified by gender, age and education--on active and passive smoking, alcohol intake and aspects of dietary habits.Type Of StudyTest-retest reliability.SettingUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Participants192 University employees.ProceduresSelf-administered questionnaires were completed on two occasions, two weeks apart.Main MeasurementsKappa Statistics; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.ResultsInformation on smoking status and pack-years smoked had almost perfect levels of agreement, respectively, kappa = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00), and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93 (CI 95%, 0.89-0.96). Characteristics of alcohol intake yielded substantial levels of agreement (kappa ranging from 0.62 to 0.69). The reproducibility of the information on dietary habits varied from 0.67 to 0.79 (kappa). No clear-cut patterns could be identified comparing information by age or gender. There was a slight tendency towards greater reliability among people with higher levels of education.ConclusionThe reproducibility of information on smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns ranged from substantial to excellent, as investigated in the Pró-Saúde Study, a longitudinal investigation recently launched in Rio de Janeiro.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…