-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomized and prospective study on the value of antibiotic prophylaxis administration in transurethral resection of the prostate.
- Paulo Rodrigues, Flávio Hering, Alex Meller, João Carlos Campagnari, and Márcio D'Império.
- Urology and Nephrology Clinic, Neurourology and Voiding Disturbances Section, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil. Paulortrodrigues@aol.com
- Sao Paulo Med J. 2004 Jan 8; 122 (1): 474-7.
ContextAntibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate is a regular practice in urology. However, its prophylactic effect can be questioned when the antiseptic surgical technique is used. Nonetheless, urine culture-oriented antibiotic therapy is the gold standard for avoiding improper medication usage and bacterial resistance.ObjectiveTo study the efficacy of antibiotic usage in patients with negative urine cultures, who were submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate.Type Of StudyProspective open labeled study.SettingTertiary care referral hospital.Participants124 consecutive patients, who were randomly divided into two groups to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or not.Main MeasurementsCultures from meatus, urine, irrigation and antiseptic fluid, and prostate tissue chips, were compared and analyzed for bacterial sensitivity to the antibiotic used, according to the surgeon's personal criteria. McLennan's test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsNo statistically significant difference regarding clinical evolution was found between the groups that received or antibiotics or not. Statistical significance was found regarding the occurrence of positive urine cultures during the postoperative period for those not receiving antibiotics, but not in relation to fever, prostate chip culture or bacteremic episodes. Sixty-eight subjects (57.1%) presented positive prostatic tissue culture. There was no specific correlation between the recovered bacteria from the meatus, prostatic tissue chip and urine and the spectrum of the administered antibiotic. Six cases showed the same bacteria in the urine and prostatic tissue chip. Only fifteen cases (25%) in the antibiotic group showed the desired sensitivity directed to the collected bacteria.ConclusionsAntibiotic prophylaxis for patients whose urine is sterile is debatable in patients who are candidates for transurethral resection of the prostate. Most of the time, the antibiotic agent used is not specific for any of the bacteria recovered from the various sources analyzed.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.