• Ana Cristina Cotta, Maria Letícia Cintra, de SouzaElemir MacedoEM, Luis Alberto Magna, and José Vassallo.
• Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
• Sao Paulo Med J. 2004 Jul 1; 122 (4): 161165161-5.

ContextNon-specific lymphocytic infiltrates of the skin pose difficulties in daily practice in pathology. There is still a lack of pathognomonic signs for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymphocytic infiltrates.ObjectiveTo evaluate the morphological and immunohistochemical profile of lymphocytic infiltrations of the skin according to clinical outcome.Type Of StudyRetrospective; histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis.SettingReferral center, university hospital.Sample28 cases of lymphocytic infiltrates of difficult differential diagnosis selected from the records.Main MeasurementsEighteen histological variables and the immunophenotypic profile were assessed using the CD4, CD8, CD3, CD20 and CD30 lymphoid markers and compared to subsequent follow-up.ResultsThe most common diagnoses were: initial mycosis fungoides (eight cases) and drug reactions (five cases). Single morphological variables did not discriminate between benign and malignant infiltrates except for the presence of Pautrier-Darier's microabscesses, which were found only in mycosis fungoides (p = 0.015). Patterns of superficial and deep infiltration (p = 0.037) and also the presence of eosinophils (p = 0.0207) were more frequently found in benign lymphocytic infiltrates. Immunohistochemical profile of T-cell subsets showed overlap between benign and malignant infiltrates with a predominance of CD4-positive (helper) lymphocytes in the majority of cases.ConclusionsA combination of clinical and histological features remains the most reliable approach for establishing a definite diagnosis in cases of lymphoid skin infiltrates.

16 keywords...

hide…