• Silvana Darcie and Cléa Rodrigues Leone.
• Prof. Pedro de Alcântara Children's Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. sdarcie@uol.com.br
• Sao Paulo Med J. 2005 Nov 3; 123 (6): 261265261-5.

Context And ObjectiveVery low birth weight (VLBW) infants have special nutritional needs. There is a current tendency to individualize their protein needs. The objective of this study was to determine the suitability of serum and urinary urea as indicators for protein intake in adequate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) VLBW infants.Design And SettingProspective study in the nursery attached to the Maternity Ward of the "Prof. Pedro de Alcântara" Children's Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.MethodsSeventy-two VLBW infants (mean protein intake = 3.7 mg/kg/day) were enrolled in a prospective cohort study in two groups: AGA (n = 34) and SGA (n = 38). Blood samples, six-hour urine (6hUr) collections and urine sample tests (STUr) were obtained for urea and creatinine assays at three and five weeks of life.Statistical AnalysisStudent's t test, Pearson correlation and linear regression (p < 0.05).ResultsThere were no differences between groups for serum urea, 6hUr and STUr, or between two assessments within each group. Serum urea correlated with 6hUr in both AGA and SGA, and to STUr in SGA; 6hUr correlated with STUr in both AGA and SGA. There was no correlation between protein intake and serum or urine urea.ConclusionsSerum and urinary urea did not reflect protein intake when mean intakes of 3.7 g/kg/day were used. Sample tests of urinary urea can be as reliable as urea from urine collected over longer periods.

28 keywords...

hide…