• Spine · Oct 2024

    A New Pilot Hole Preparation System for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement - A Randomized Controlled Study.

    • Chaobo Feng, Longfei Wang, Sheng Yang, Xinbo Wu, Yunshan Fan, Huang Yan, Fangjing Chen, Jia Chen, Xiang Wang, Qishuai Guo, Longxiang Yao, Yingchuan Zhao, Shisheng He, and Haijian Ni.
    • Department of Orthopedic, Spinal Pain Research Institute, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200072, P. R. China.
    • Spine. 2024 Oct 11.

    Study DesignRandomized controlled study.ObjectiveTo introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method.Summary Of Background DataPlacing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications.MethodsA total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in basic information between the two groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08±1.01 min in the new system group and 5.34±1.30 min in the conventional method group (P<0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82±0.20 vs 1.72±0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70±3.42 vs 19.95±5.50 s) (P<0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group (P=0.027).ConclusionsThe new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…