• Annals of medicine · Dec 2024

    Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS), FibroScan, and liver fibrosis index (FIB-4) for identifying fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with chronic hepatitis B with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.

    • Youwen Tan and Xinyue Zhang.
    • Department of Hepatology, The Third Hospital of Zhenjiang Affiliated Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
    • Ann. Med. 2024 Dec 1; 56 (1): 24208582420858.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis score (NFS), FibroScan, and liver fibrosis index (FIB-4) for identifying fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).MethodsAll patients with CHB and MAFLD who underwent liver biopsy at the Zhenjiang Third Hospital affiliated with Jiangsu University between August 2010 and December 2022 were included in the analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of FAST, NFS, FibroScan, and FIB-4 for diagnosing NASH and liver fibrosis were evaluated based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsA total of 156 patients with CHB combined with MAFLD were included, including 69 with NASH and fibrosis stage 2 or higher (NASH+F ≥ 2), and 16 with NASH and cirrhosis (NASH+F4). The AUC of FAST, NFS, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and FIB-4 for diagnosing NASH+F ≥ 2 was 0.739 (p < 0.001), 0.643 (p = 0.006), 0.754 (p < 0.001), and 0.665 (p = 0.003), respectively. The specificity of FAST, NFS, LSM, and FIB-4 was 67%, 51.8%, 78.6% and 76.8%, respectively, and the sensitivity was 75%, 78.6%, 67.9%, and 53.6%, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups. The AUC of FAST, NFS, LSM, and FIB-4 for diagnosing NASH+F4 was 0.650 (p = 0.038), 0.725 (p = 0.001), 0.851 (p < 0.001), and 0.560 (p = 0.533), respectively. The specificity of the FAST, NFS, LSM, and FIB-4 was 55.9%, 50.0%, 71.6%, and 75.5%, respectively and the sensitivity was 80.0%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. The differences between AUCs of FIB-4 and FAST compared with LSM were 0.291 and 0.201, respectively (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn patients with CHB combined with MAFLD, FAST did not have better accuracy than NFS and FIB-4 for predicting fibrotic NASH, whereas LSM had better accuracy than FAST and FIB-4.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…