• JAMA · Oct 2024

    Expanded Newborn Screening Using Genome Sequencing for Early Actionable Conditions.

    • Alban Ziegler, Carrie Koval-Burt, Denise M Kay, Sharon F Suchy, Amber Begtrup, Katherine G Langley, Rebecca Hernan, Laura M Amendola, Brenna M Boyd, Jennifer Bradley, Tracy Brandt, Lilian L Cohen, Alison J Coffey, Joseph M Devaney, Beata Dygulska, Bethany Friedman, Ramsay L Fuleihan, Awura Gyimah, Sihoun Hahn, Sean Hofherr, Kathleen S Hruska, Zhanzhi Hu, Médéric Jeanne, Guanjun Jin, D Aaron Johnson, Haluk Kavus, Rudolph L Leibel, Steven J Lobritto, Stephen McGee, Joshua D Milner, Kirsty McWalter, Kristin G Monaghan, Jordan S Orange, Nicole Pimentel Soler, Yeyson Quevedo, Samantha Ratner, Kyle Retterer, Ankur Shah, Natasha Shapiro, Robert J Sicko, Eric S Silver, Samuel Strom, Rebecca I Torene, Olatundun Williams, Vincent D Ustach, Julia Wynn, Ryan J Taft, Paul Kruszka, Michele Caggana, and Wendy K Chung.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
    • JAMA. 2024 Oct 24.

    ImportanceThe feasibility of implementing genome sequencing as an adjunct to traditional newborn screening (NBS) in newborns of different racial and ethnic groups is not well understood.ObjectiveTo report interim results of acceptability, feasibility, and outcomes of an ongoing genomic NBS study in a diverse population in New York City within the context of the New York State Department of Health Newborn Screening Program.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsThe Genomic Uniform-screening Against Rare Disease in All Newborns (GUARDIAN) study was a multisite, single-group, prospective, observational investigation of supplemental newborn genome screening with a planned enrollment of 100 000 participants. Parent-reported race and ethnicity were recorded at the time of recruitment. Results of the first 4000 newborns enrolled in 6 New York City hospitals between September 2022 and July 2023 are reported here as part of a prespecified interim analysis.ExposureSequencing of 156 early-onset genetic conditions with established interventions selected by the investigators were screened in all participants and 99 neurodevelopmental disorders associated with seizures were optional.Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcome was screen-positive rate. Additional outcomes included enrollment rate and successful completion of sequencing.ResultsOver 11 months, 5555 families were approached and 4000 (72.0%) consented to participate. Enrolled participants reflected a diverse group by parent-reported race (American Indian or Alaska Native, 0.5%; Asian, 16.5%; Black, 25.1%; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 0.1%; White, 44.7%; 2 or more races, 13.0%) and ethnicity (Hispanic, 44.0%; not Hispanic, 56.0%). The majority of families consented to screening of both groups of conditions (both groups, 90.6%; disorders with established interventions only, 9.4%). Testing was successfully completed for 99.6% of cases. The screen-positive rate was 3.7%, including treatable conditions that are not currently included in NBS.Conclusions And RelevanceThese interim findings demonstrate the feasibility of targeted interpretation of a predefined set of genes from genome sequencing in a population of different racial and ethnic groups. DNA sequencing offers an additional method to improve screening for conditions already included in NBS and to add those that cannot be readily screened because there is no biomarker currently detectable in dried blood spots. Additional studies are required to understand if these findings are generalizable to populations of different racial and ethnic groups and whether introduction of sequencing leads to changes in management and improved health outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05990179.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…