• J. Am. Coll. Surg. · Oct 2024

    How Well Are Surgical Quality Improvement Projects Planned? Review of 242 Surgical Improvement Efforts Across Five American College of Surgeons Quality Programs.

    • Tejen A Shah, Xane D Peters, Shelbie D Waddle, Eileen Reilly, Sarah F Valek, Lynn Modla, Karen Pollitt, and Clifford Y Ko.
    • American College of Surgeons, Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, Chicago, IL.
    • J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2024 Oct 16.

    BackgroundStructured preparation is necessary to conduct quality improvement (QI) strategies that are relevant to the problem, feasible, appropriately resourced, and potentially effective. Recent work suggests improvement efforts are sub-optimally conducted. Our goal was to determine how well preparation for surgical QI is undertaken, including detailing the problem, setting project goals, and planning an intervention.Study DesignThis retrospective cross-sectional study included QI efforts submitted in 2019 to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) during review for accreditation across five ACS Quality Programs: Children's Surgery Verification (CSV), the Commission on Cancer (CoC), the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgical Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC), and the Trauma Verification Program. Projects were scored for alignment with three components of the pre-conduct phase of the ACS Quality Framework: problem detailing, goal specification, and strategic planning.Results242 projects satisfied inclusion criteria and were scored. Most projects in the final cohort were from MBSAQIP (36%), CoC (31%), or NAPBC (29%) programs. The average overall pre-conduct score was 52% (Standard Deviation (SD)=17). On average, projects performed best in the 'Goal Specification' component (65% SD=27), followed by 'Problem Detailing' (52% SD=16), and 'Strategic Planning' (44% SD=25). Within these components, identification of possible limitations (5%) and consideration of contextual issues (12%) were among the least frequently reported items.ConclusionsThorough planning is a critical component of effective QI, and our study reflects significant opportunity for its improvement. The ACS Quality Framework may serve as a guide to improve QI planning, thereby promoting efficiency and effectiveness of these efforts.Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…