-
Comparative Study
Comparison of double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suture technique and open surgical repair for Morgagni hernia.
- Mehmet Sarikaya, Özcan SikiFatmaF0000-0002-4461-3461Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkiye., Metin Gündüz, Tamer Sekmenli, and İlhan Çiftci.
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkiye.
- Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jan 1; 54 (5): 989994989-994.
Background/AimWe aimed to compare the results of open surgery and double-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair for the treatment of Morgagni hernia (MH).Materials And MethodsTwenty-two patients with MH who were operated on in our clinic between January 2012 and January 2023 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique: open surgery (OS) (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (LS) (n = 8). Retrospective comparisons were made between the groups' demographic information, surgical method used, defect size, operation time, length of hospital stay, costs, postoperative problems, and recurrence.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding sex, defect size, or costs. The mean age of the patients in the LS group (101 ± 68.3 months) was significantly higher than that of the OS group (23 ± 18.2 months) (p = 0.005). The operation time of the LS group (33.8 ± 3.6 min) was significantly shorter than that of the OS group (50.8 ± 6.5 min) (p < 0.01). Moreover, the LS group's mean length of hospitalization (1.6 ± 0.9 days) was significantly lower than that of the OS group (2.8 ± 0.7 days) (p = 0.027).ConclusionDouble-port laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal suturing repair is a reliable technique preferred over open surgical repair due to its shorter operative time and hospital stay, ease of application, better cosmetic results, and no cost difference.© TÜBİTAK.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.