• Chest · Oct 2024

    Clinical and Prognostic Differences in Mild to Moderate COPD With and Without Emphysema.

    • Huajing Yang, Yuqiong Yang, Fengyan Wang, Chengyu Miao, Zizheng Chen, Shanshan Zha, Xueping Li, Jiawei Chen, Aiqi Song, Rongchang Chen, and Zhenyu Liang.
    • State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, postcode, China; Guangzhou National Lab, Guangzhou, Guangdong, postcode, China.
    • Chest. 2024 Oct 23.

    BackgroundThe clinical and prognostic characteristics of mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without emphysema remain inadequately investigated.Research QuestionDo the clinical and prognostic characteristics differ between mild- to-moderate COPD with and without emphysema?Study Design And MethodsWe obtained clinical data of 989 participants with mild-to-moderate COPD from the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS). They were categorized into two groups based on their baseline %LAA-950 of less than 5% on CT scans: those with emphysema (EC group) and those without emphysema (NEC group). Linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess the differences in the decline of lung function, health-related quality of life, and quantitative CT indices between these two groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions were employed to evaluate the rates of acute respiratory exacerbations between the groups.ResultsAmong participants with mild-to-moderate COPD, 428 (43.3%) exhibited emphysema on CT scans. The annual decline in FEV1 was -56.1 mL/year for the EC group and -46.9 mL/year for the NEC group, with a non-significant between-group difference of 9.1 mL/year (95% CI, -24.0 to 5.7 mL/year). The rate of emphysema progression in the EC group was significantly lower than in the NEC group (-0.173%; 95% CI, -0.252 to -0.094). The EC group also showed a more pronounced annual increase in the SGRQ score (0.9 points) compared to the NEC group. The EC group had a higher rate of acute respiratory exacerbations (0.36 per person-year) than the NEC group (0.25 per person-year), with a rate ratio of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.27 to 1.54).InterpretationMild-to-moderate COPD with emphysema did not have accelerated rates of decline in FEV1, but they experienced significantly worsen health-related quality of life and a higher rate of acute respiratory exacerbations. The non-emphysema subtype demonstrated increased emphysema progression.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…