• Annals of surgery · Oct 2024

    Artificial Intelligence Assisted Surgical Scene Recognition: A Comparative Study Amongst Healthcare Professionals.

    • Simon C Williams, Jinfan Zhou, William R Muirhead, Danyal Z Khan, Chan Hee Koh, Razna Ahmed, Jonathan P Funnell, John G Hanrahan, Alshaymaa Mortada Ali, Shankhaneel Ghosh, Tarık Sarıdoğan, Alexandra Valetopoulou, Patrick Grover, Danail Stoyanov, Mary Murphy, Evangelos B Mazomenos, and Hani J Marcus.
    • Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, United Kingdom.
    • Ann. Surg. 2024 Oct 30.

    ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the ability of a deep-learning platform (the MACSSwin-T model) with healthcare professionals in detecting cerebral aneurysms from operative videos. Secondly, we aimed to compare the neurosurgical team's ability to detect cerebral aneurysms with and without AI-assistance.BackgroundModern microscopic surgery enables the capture of operative video data on an unforeseen scale. Advances in computer vision, a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), have enabled automated analysis of operative video. These advances are likely to benefit clinicians, healthcare systems, and patients alike, yet such benefits are yet to be realised.MethodsIn a cross-sectional comparative study, neurosurgeons, anaesthetists, and operating room (OR) nurses, all at varying stages of training and experience, reviewed still frames of aneurysm clipping operations and labelled frames as "aneurysm not in frame" or "aneurysm in frame". Frames then underwent analysis by the AI platform. A second round of data collection was performed whereby the neurosurgical team had AI-assistance. Accuracy of aneurysm detection was calculated for human only, AI only, and AI-assisted human groups.Results5,154 individual frame reviews were collated from 338 healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals correctly labelled 70% of frames without AI assistance, compared to 78% with AI-assistance (OR 1.77, P<0.001). Neurosurgical Attendings showed the greatest improvement, from 77% to 92% correct predictions with AI-assistance (OR 4.24, P=0.003).ConclusionAI-assisted human performance surpassed both human and AI alone. Notably, across healthcare professionals surveyed, frame accuracy improved across all subspecialties and experience levels, particularly among the most experienced healthcare professionals. These results challenge the prevailing notion that AI primarily benefits junior clinicians, highlighting its crucial role throughout the surgical hierarchy as an essential component of modern surgical practice.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.